Los Principios Universales


Volviendo a mis raíces pseudocientíficas sobre las leyes universales psicofísicas.

Los siete principios o axiomas, como están descritos en el Kybalión, son:

Mentalismo. El Todo es mente; el universo es mental. El Todo es el conjunto totalizador. Nada hay fuera del Todo.

Correspondencia. Como es arriba, es abajo; como es abajo, es arriba. Afirma que este principio se manifiesta en los tres Grandes Planos: el Físico, el Mental y el Espiritual.

Vibración. Nada está inmóvil; todo se mueve; todo vibra.

Polaridad. Todo es doble, todo tiene dos polos; todo, su par de opuestos: los semejantes y los antagónicos son lo mismo; los opuestos son idénticos en naturaleza, pero diferentes en grado; los extremos se tocan; todas las verdades son medias verdades, todas las paradojas pueden reconciliarse.

Ritmo. Todo fluye y refluye; todo tiene sus períodos de avance y retroceso, todo asciende y desciende; todo se mueve como un péndulo; la medida de su movimiento hacia la derecha es la misma que la de su movimiento hacia la izquierda; el ritmo es la compensación.

Causa y efecto. Toda causa tiene su efecto; todo efecto tiene su causa; todo sucede de acuerdo a la ley; la suerte o azar no es más que el nombre que se le da a la ley no reconocida; hay muchos planos de causalidad, pero nada escapa a la Ley.

Género. El género existe por doquier; todo tiene su principio masculino y femenino; el género se manifiesta en todos los planos. En el plano físico es la sexualidad.

Draókos (The Black Dragon)
Psicofilosofía Urbana es (c)1980
Copyright 1980 ICP

Sócrates, padre de la filosofía moral


La filosofía moral trata del bien y el mal en relación a los actos humanos. También estudia la virtud y la felicidad, así como el modo de alcanzarlas. Sócrates fue el primer filósofo que convirtió estas cuestiones en elementos centrales de su pensamiento. Debido a ello, y a su enorme influencia histórica en este campo del conocimiento, es considerado el padre de la filosofía moral.

Tanto la vida como la muerte de Sócrates fueron ejemplos rigurosos de coherencia respecto a su doctrina moral, lo cual incrementó el impacto de sus ideas en muchos de sus discípulos. Algunos de éstos fundaron varias de las principales corrientes de filosofía moral de la historia:

– Escuela cínica.

Fundada por el filósofo Antístenes.

Los cínicos afirmaban que la felicidad no reside en los bienes materiales, y que ni siquiera debemos preocuparnos por la salud o el sufrimiento.

– Escuela estoica.

Fundada por el filósofo Zenón, uno de los seguidores de Antístenes. Los estoicos sostenían que hay que afrontar con tranquilidad y sin queja tanto los bienes como los males que nos depara el destino.

– Escuela epicúrea.

Fundada por el filósofo Epicuro, quien desarrolló las ideas que había formulado el filósofo Aristipo un siglo antes. La doctrina de Aristipo consistía en evitar el dolor y buscar el placer sin llegar a caer en un comportamiento vicioso.

Epicuro propugnaba una combinación entre placer —no limitado a los sentidos— y moderación; también afirmaba que no debemos temer la muerte pues es simplemente una inexistencia en la que no es posible sufrir.

Algunos epicúreos posteriores abogaron por una búsqueda extrema del placer, representada por el lema «aprovecha el momento»

(«Carpe Diem»).

Enciclopedia Universal. Socram Ofisis. 1931.

Sócrates, padre del Humanismo…


El Humanismo es la doctrina o movimiento que destaca el valor del ser humano. Otorga gran importancia a la educación, considerando que ésta puede desarrollar el potencial inherente de cada hombre, lo cual además optimizará su aportación a la sociedad.

En el Renacimiento se produjo una reacción al teocentrismo medieval, donde Dios y la religión ocupaban el centro del universo y lo explicaban todo, y se pasó a un antropocentrismo en el que el hombre se convierte en el responsable de su propio destino.

La razón y el estudio empírico sustituyeron a la fe y a las supersticiones como herramientas para analizar el mundo. Asimismo, los humanistas del Renacimiento se volcaron en el estudio de los clásicos griegos y romanos, considerando que en ellos ya se recogía el ideal de hombre que ellos buscaban.

Algunos de los representantes más destacados del humanismo renacentista son Petrarca, Erasmo de Rótterdam y Leonardo da Vinci.

Mil setecientos años antes del Renacimiento vivió Sócrates, el primer filósofo que convirtió al hombre en el centro de atención de la filosofía.

Los filósofos anteriores a él se habían dedicado al estudio de la naturaleza, mientras que los sofistas de su época se ocuparon de los asuntos humanos, pero sólo con el interés de obtener victorias retóricas con un fin práctico.

En cambio, en la filosofía de Sócrates —y en su modo de vida—, la ética ocupa un lugar central que refuerza su condición de padre del Humanismo. …

Enciclopedia Universal. Socram Ofisis. 1931.

Extraído del libro por Marcos Chicot; El Asesinato de Sócrates (Finalista Premio Planeta 2016) (Spanish Edition)

The world as we know it is gone


Cognitive Entanglement

Cognitive Singularity Entanglement

The world needs women to take control of what is rightfully theirs since the dawn of time.  Men let us swallow our pride (egocentrically narcissistic) and make women rule over mother earth (March, copyright 1998). The Greek word for earth is Gia (you wonder why is called mother) because a mother is the bearer of life.  History told us over, and again, that man cannot rule over themselves or Gia.  What is a mother? A mother is the giver of life and we, as men, are working with and for her.  Man’s greed is to overcome and conquer; is what has gotten us to this senseless point for what, power?

What power, we are not gods only gods have that ability, and we do not deserve to be like God.  The male species of this planet are an aberration that should not have been.  Ever since man took over leadership by force and strength, all went to shit.  Killings, killings, and more killings.  What else can go wrong or worsened since the beginning of time?  Total annihilation, genocide because of men’s greed?  God did not mean man, and meaning the one with the phallus, a penis, (for those who do not understand, dicks between our legs) in charge of anything.  Misinterpretation of scripture is so narcissistic that men believed God put “man in charge.”

God did not put a man in charge of anything; it was a metaphor of humanity.  There is nothing in scripture that shows this alleged status.  The Europeans have had queens that have ruled millions of times better than man.  Let us quit being so childish and let place women where there should have been since the beginning of time.  Let them lead, as natural leaders they are.  Men are not pons, but we are hard workers and providers, excellent cooks, architects, navigator, medical doctors, but greed or need for control, power, and destruction for an alleged better society is truly clear.

The right side of the brain deals with the mathematical, analytical, and other activities such as music, architectural design, but never was meant to organize or leadership.  Women are organized, focused and multitasking, as for men, we can only do well one thing at a time; hence women advantage of getting things carried out effectively and efficiently.  In the year 2000, in 1999 a new era for humankind began, a new century, a unique time beginning and to be reborn as a new human species.  Let us quit our megalomania and let women guide our steps and choose the right path to a righteous way for a better life as a human.

Women are the bearer of human life.  Let them guides us beyond the scope of thinking and limitations of living have the crate a new world or transformation, a new world utopia, the time has been there for a radical change in lifestyle.  As a male of the human species, this has been common knowledge for a long time and working with them has ever been a problem.  Is it going to be difficult for most men?  Sure, we were programmed to do something not meant for us; and now, we must unwind ourselves back to the original mental structures?  We know this for a long time; many men knew this but decided to follow the status quo for fear of repression and retaliation.

It is time for a real change and do whatever comes naturally to us, works and provide, heal or cure, teach, or build.  Let women lead us into a new harmonious era of living and a better quality of life.  It is overdue, by thousands of years.  In the beginning; our existence used to be matriarchal reconsidered going back to those times.  Them days mothers love was none abusive raising emotionally stable healthy human beings.  Writing an empirical thesis on this issue is nonsensical.  We know this to be undertaken truth, and history has proven it to be so.  Let us propose what is right and comply, let us lay back and give women their rightful responsibility to raise a sane and a more emotionally stable society.

Women should be encouraged to raise their innate intellectual coefficient and stop doing things for male species; women have greater talents for productivity than been servants to men wishes; women are their equal or better.  Let us rid domination and abusive behavior over the female gender.  Having stronger physical anatomy does not give us the right to mistreat the females of any society, in any part of the world.  Moreover, for that matter any human been or creature.

In the 21st century, and we are not gods.  We are as mortal as a mortal can be.  Women have been the household leaders all their lives; they know what and how to manage and organized and keep a harmonious environment for the coexistence of the family keeping it happy and running smoothly.

Most men are the best chefs, fashion designers, stylist, choreographers, constructors, architects, scientists, medical doctors and much more, but fail as leaders of nations.  Narcissist individuals that change the world; Alexander the Great, Henry the Eighth, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolph Hitler, Caesar, Nero, Ganges Kan, Constantine, and new ones most commonly know, I will leave it to your imagination, and is not the way to govern or manage a world in which we live in.  Let spread these words all over the world seventy times-fold.  Translate these words into the native language.

These words should cover the globe in their respective native languages in their respective modes of communications.  Electronically, by the written word, by word of mouth (without changing its essence).  Let us unite and attempt against all world organizations that use human trafficking (mainly females and children) for their sick, personal and emotional gain.  — These people were damaged at the time of their innocent infancy and our childhood, I am not justifying their acts but social psychology and psychology what an unhealthy environment can do to individuals susceptible to these types of behaviors.

Find it within yourselves to help change society to a new generation as the hippies did in the sixties.  Since acquired knowledge, instead to work with and for a woman than an egocentric man.  Honestly, it will not have anything to do with identity issues; I adore the feminine gender.  I know that they lead the way much better than us.  I have seen it and lived it.  Open your eyes and find the truth is right in front of you.  Is implicit that there cannot be abusive behavior or lack of respect for one another on both sides of the balance.  No matter what gender you consider, yourself to be.

The connection is essential for keeping equilibrium.  All past laws, rules, regulations, ordinances that strangle society must stop, and only women evaluate these rules, with the help of men.  Just do away with that which does not apply anymore in a contemporary technological system.  Bring in a new better way of living in peace and harmony.  I am certain that if women were the lead, most common issues like homelessness, lack of sustenance, decent living quarters and amenities would be at the reach of every human being in the world if we let women lead.

In conclusion, there is an old American saying, a bit vulgar, but apply.  KISS keeps it simple…

I conclude with an old American saying, a bit vulgar, but applies, KISS, keep it simple… References March, J. R. (Copyright 1998). Cassell Dictionary of Classical Mythology XX-00691 — Entry on Gaia. (U. 4. 698, Ed.) United Kingdom: Cassell and Co. in the UK. doi: ISBN: 0-304-34626-8.

Draókos (The Black Dragon)
Psicofilosofía Urbana es (c)1980
Copyright 1980 ICP

Am I sane?


Cognitive Quantum Entanglement

Quantum Entanglement

Depression, anxiety, compulsiveness, rage, destructiveness, auto sabotage, these are all symptoms of the after-effects of military training only.  Either the VA or those who help veterans don’t want to help, is way too much work, is overwhelming work, I understand.  Some don’t care because of the system others because of the money and meantime lies and more lies.  Thank you for your service.  The first time I heard that it moved me emotionally.  “Thank you for your service” what the hell does that mean?  It seems, perception, that is a polite way to say “Thank you for good by.”  I guess I feel for all those Vets who suffered the effects of war or combat — been shot at, yell at, intimidated, scorn, obliged to take a bullet or a mine.  For alleged protection of a way of thinking of justice and liberty for ALL.  Really for ALL?

Then I ask myself why there is still so much judgment against others because of Nationality of Color of their skin?  Jesus Christ this is all a fake, pure and simple hypocrisy of the people in power putting a show for others to applaud and adore.  Yeah, there is the rage in my words, I am not asleep like many, including government workers.  If you considered a Public servant, does anyone knows what it means?  Is like the new generations of medical doctors, I am not generalizing in all aspects, they are not doctors because of a vocation towards the human race, they are there for personal interest, nothing to do with human health and quality of living.

The pharmaceuticals push on these professionals if you will, drugs that can KILL, and they will give them to their patients.  I don’t remember now the exact name of the Star Trek movie “The Final Frontier” Mr. Spok gets into the engine reactor room to engage some device manually to save the crew of the Enterprise from certain death.  Leonard Nemo in his speech said to captain Kirk something that for many years I did not really think about it until these past few days, and in my opinion (moreover, I just saw it last night in Sense 8), he said: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the FEW of the ONE.”  My God that is the most stupid thing I ever realized until now, so what he said that life is worth SHAT.

So if the pharmaceutical thru a professional medical doctor, gave you a prill, it might be your wife, daughter, granddaughter, or a very endearing person to you and that person or individual dies, is OKAY?  REALLY?

So what the hell.  Why doesn’t the government instill the draft again?  Make every person aged between 18 and 23.  Oh yeah, they want you young because they can twist your mind around using a technique developed by a Psychology Theorist Pavlov, that will destroy your life forever and never been the emotionally healthy person again because you will always think of about killing the enemy.  I ask what enemy?  Who is my enemy?  In the movie the Last Samuray, extraordinary movie, there is a scene where one of the protagonists says to Tom Cruise, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

So from what perspective are, we have seen, the enemy.  So an infant would be my enemy, a daughter, a mother a granddaughter, a son, father., uncle, and so forth.  So if I am different from you, I am your enemy, because I have different values?  How does that work? I don’t get it.

So I am a crazy veteran trying to claim something benefits that don’t exist at the Veterans Affairs Office because they are offers to individuals who served in combat and or where atrophied by a traumatic event during their active military duty.  They claim Veterans have benefits, they don’t say some Veterans have benefits, so there is a vagueness in the assumption that all Veterans have benefits because they serve in active duty and they deserve them, this is a false statement.  Young individuals are deceived to get veterans affected by Pavlov training something they did not earn because all humans, ALL HUMANS are indispensable.   So why do we have jails and alleged killers in them, people natural tendency is not to kill one another, unless genetically or quantum cognitively are predisposed to do so?

However, if you are cage like a rat, like many societies do to their people, snap out and kill others, then they have an unacceptable bad behavior.  That’s is me.  Because I think this way, I have become a menace to world order and unstable the control that governments have over their constituents.

Draókos
Psicofilosofía Urbana (c)1980
Copyright Draókos ICP (1rst. rev.)

Dear Man


DEAR MAN

Did you know that when you enter a woman womb, in reality, you are inside another human being, that you become one with her?

Do you ever realize how sacred that is?  That this is as close to unity as you will ever experience, and that she has that gift for you.  Whence you go back into the womb you are born again that you can plant the seeds of creation in her too.  That when you leave her, she feels the separation as you physically withdraw and leave her empty.

That being allowed to enter, is a gift, an honor, something sacred, and that it is your job to know, respect and honor this.

That her heart and her sex are yoked, and when you want to enter her sex, you also enter her heart.  She feels everything when you enter since all your energy is existence acknowledged within her.

So, you have the responsibility to enter with the transparency of intentions, since she will feel all the ways you could use it to avoid feeling her pain or emotions.

You have to be aware of why you are entering it, and what you are filling it.  That sex is the cosmic union of feminine and masculine energy, a sacred meeting of polarities, and it has nothing to do with reaching orgasm, if it will last long enough, size, another number for your collection or your value.

To open up to a woman is to go deep, but not go deep inside her, it is to go deep inside of you, to know yourself. The deeper you can enter you, the deeper you can enter a woman.

Zoe Johansen

Querido Hombre


QUERIDO HOMBRE

¿Sabes que cuando entras en una mujer, en realidad estás dentro de otro ser humano, estás dentro de ella? 

¿Alguna vez te has dado cuenta de lo sagrado que es esto?

Que esto es lo más cercano a la unidad que alguna vez vas a experimentar, y que ella tiene ese regalo para ti. 

Que puedes volver al útero y al punto de la creación. Que puedes plantar las semillas de la creación también. 

Que cuando la dejas, ella siente la separación mientras te retiras físicamente y la dejas vacía. 

Que ser permitido entrar dentro de ella es un regalo, un honor, algo sagrado, y que es tu trabajo saber, respetar y honrar esto. 

Que su corazón está conectado a su sexo, y que cuando quieres entrar en su sexo, también entras en su corazón. 

Que ella siente todo cuando entras en ella, ya que toda tu energía está siendo acogida dentro de ella. 

Así que, tienes la responsabilidad de entrar con transparencia de intenciones, ya que ella sentirá todas las formas en que podrías usarlo para evitar sentir su propio dolor o emociones. 

Tienes que ser consciente de por qué estás entrando en ella, y con lo que la estás llenando. 

Ese sexo es la unión cósmica de la energía femenina y masculina, una reunión sagrada de polaridades, y no tiene nada que ver con llegar al orgasmo, si durará lo suficiente, el tamaño, otro número para tu colección o tu valor. 

Abrirte realmente a una mujer se trata de ir profundo, pero no ir profundamente dentro de ella, es ir profundamente dentro de ti, conocerte a ti mismo. Cuanto más profundo eres capaz de entrar en ti, más profundo puedes entrar en una mujer. 

Zoe Johansen

What is a Mother?


What is a Mother?
From my point of view, a Mother is a person without gender or sex.  A person detached from herself or himself to dedicate in body and soul, all her life to the healthy emotional development of an infant.

This mama works with the only tools available on hand and learns from its parents and environment, to mold that infant, into a person with good feelings, values, resilient, self-confident, able to give the world compassion and blessing for others.

In my opinion, a mother only what she was taught but also can do much more to turn lives around. The pronoun (She) is used in the noun Mother which is a female term but not necessarily so.

¿Qué es una Madre?
Desde mi punto de vista, una madre es una persona sin género ni sexo, pura singularidad. Una persona desprendida de sí misma o de sí mismo para dedicar en cuerpo y alma, toda su vida al desarrollo emocional saludable de un recién nacido.

Esta mamá trabaja con las únicas herramientas disponibles en la mano y ha aprendido de sus antepasados y el entorno en el que se desarrolló.  Es una singularidad para moldear a un infante, a convertirse en una persona con buenos sentimientos, valores, resiliente, segura de sí misma, capaz de dar al mundo compasión y bendición para los todos.

En mi opinión, una madre solo puede dar lo que tiene o enseñaron, pero también puede hacer mucho más para cambiar las vidas de la humanidad. El pronombre (Ella) se usa en el sustantivo Madre, un término femenino, pero no necesariamente así.

 

References
Simopoulou Z. (2019) Selfhood; Eilidh and Fernando Pessoa. In: Young Children’s
Existential Encounters. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Bachelard, G. (1971). The poetics of reverie. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar 

Butler, J. (2001). Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics, 31(4), 22–40.
CrossRef Google Scholar 

Cavarero, A. (2000). Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar 

Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Doing collective biography. Berkshire: Open University           Press.
Google Scholar 

Grigore, R. (2011). Fernando Pessoa’s the book of disquiet. Imagination, reality and the           pleasure of masking and dreaming. Theory in Action, 4(1), 38–47.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Laing, R. D. (1965). The divided self. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. (2011). On not being found: A Winnicottian reading of John Banville’s                  ‘Ghosts’ and ‘Athena. Studies in the Novel, 43(3), 328–342.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Pessoa, F. (1985). A galaxy of poets. Lisbon: Servico Internacional da Fundacão Calouste          Gulbenkian.
Google Scholar

Pessoa, F. (2001). The book of disquiet (R. Zenith, Ed. and Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Pessoa, F. (2006). A little larger than the entire universe—Selected poems (R. Zenith, Ed.              and Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Pessoa, F. (2010). The book of disquiet (M. J. Costa, Trans.). London: Serpent’s Tail                       Classics.
Google Scholar

Pessoa, F. (2018). I have more souls than one (J. Griffin, Trans.). London: Penguin                        Modern.
Google Scholar

Phillips, A. (1998). The beast in the nursery. London: Faber and Faber.
Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of               certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment:             Studies in the theory of emotional development (1963). London: The Hogarth Press             and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (2005). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

(Draókos)
Psicofilosofía es (c)1980
Copyright 1980 JoeAbbis ICP

Momentos en el tiempo


It’s all about moments in time,

It’s all about moments in space…

It’s all about this moment…

This memento that is traumatize in our neurons…

It’s all about now, the present moment.

There’s no other, just the present….

Live plentiful, live well, live in peace within.

Live the best way you can…

 

Nigri Draókos
Psicofilosofía Urbana (c)1980
Copyright 1980 JoeAbbis ICP

@allrights reserved (feb 2017)